With any application in general, it is important to ensure that the user is allowed to use the system. This is known as authorization. The first step to authorizing a user is to authenticate the user or ensure the user is who they say they are. Once the user is authenticated, then the application can decide what operations/views the user is authorized to use. The de facto standard way of authenticating is by forcing the user to input a user name and password. <rant>I personally hate this.</rant>
With a stateful application, such as a desktop application, authentication is pretty straightforward: just authenticate at application launch.
Unfortunately, HTTP is stateless (keep-alives aside.) Continuation-based frameworks such as Weblocks totally remove the problem by allowing you to write your app as if it were stateful. It is quite beautiful. Continuation-based frameworks have their own uses but if they don't fit your needs, then you need a different approach.
The usual way to implement authentication for a web application to check if the client has been authenticated on each page request. Obviously, this is quite annoying if you have to do it yourself. Frameworks like ASP.NET handle this for you (\o/ frameworks) by some careful editing of XML files. As I understand it, you tell ASP.NET what resources are protected and how to authenticate when protected resources are accessed. You fill in the authentication blanks with some helper classes that MS wrote for you. ASP.NET then generates a random session ID and sets a cookie which is used in subsequent requests to the web application. Nothing special. This is wide open to MITM attacks if you don't use SSL or sufficiently secure your session ID.
Hunchentoot does none of the above but it has all the ingredients to make it possible. The idea is that we want to intercept every request and check if a protected resource is being accessed. If a protected resource is being accessed, then we need to either force authentication or pass the request along if the session is authenticated. One way to do this is to insert the appropriate code in every page using macros. Another way is to use Hunchentoot's dispatch table. Personally, I'm partial to the method covered here because it doesn't require you to remember to secure your pages. Another benefit with this method is that you can also protect non-function resources such as when you serve static content.
When Hunchentoot receives a request, it iterates through hunchentoot:*dispatch-table* executing each dispatch function. Each of these functions is meant to return a function that will serve the request when applicable. Therefore, Hunchentoot executes the first such function returned while iterating. Hopefully the solution that I am thinking of is clear: insert a dispatch function that gets called before all others that checks for an authenticated session and redirects to a login page if one is not found. Here is an example of such a dispatch function:
(defun check-login-dispatcher (request)
(unless (or hunchentoot:*session*
(starts-with (tbnl:script-name request)
Where oopsie-need-to-login looks like:
(defun oopsie-need-to-login ()
(:p "Before you can continue, you must login. For now,
just " (:a :href "/public/auto-login" "click here"))))
And public/auto-login looks like:
(defun auto-login ()
In real life, you would obviously not automatically log someone in and instead have the regular username / password form.
Further, to prevent session hijacking with Hunchentoot, you need to do atleast the following:
- Use SSL (HTTPS)
;; See Hunchentoot documentation for the meaning of these variables
(setf hunchentoot:*use-remote-addr-for-sessions* t)
(setf hunchentoot:*use-user-agent-for-sessions* t)
- You need to also redefine hunchentoot::get-next-session-id because it uses sequential session IDs which leaves you open to guessing attacks. Imagine an attacker logs in just before you and knows that the next session is N+1. Not fun.
The above method for authenticating a user is secure so long as the above three are implemented. I haven't done the third yet so I couldn't say what to do there. I think you need to generate a (theoretically) truly random number somewhere.
Update: You do *not* need to redefine hunchentoot::get-next-session-id. It turns out that information was made on a bad assumption that all the information going into the session id string was deterministic. On reading the code more, there are two elements of randomness inserted into the session string:
- The session start time
- A random string generated once per server
I think the above two are sufficient to make it secure for some value of secure. I believe the secrecy of the random string is important to the security. But I am no security expert!